Tuesday, June 12, 2012

Hester, gains the most by off-season moves?


The Bears have made a lot of moves to improve their offensive skill positions this offseason, the position that seen the most improvement was wide receiver.  The Bears added Brandon Marshall, via trade and Alshon Jeffery via the draft.  All signs point to Jeffery being a very good receiver in the NFL, but none will know till they start training camp and start playing games.  The Bears now have a true number one wide receiver, in Marshall.   Marshall is a top ten wide receiver.   While Jeffery has a ton of promise he is still an unproven rookie.  The player that might benefit the most from the acquisition of these two players is Devin Hester.

When thinking, Hester benefits the most it is a little hard to comprehend because he has had enough time to show his skill set in the NFL.  While Hester has had time to show his skill set, the one thing that the Bears have been lacking since he has been in town, is a number one wide receiver.  The benefit of having number one receiver is the coverage will role to Marshall.


Ever since Hester was moved to wide receiver I have been unable to figure out why he was always playing an outside receiver.  Hester’s best games and plays on offense have come from him playing the slot.  Yet the Bears continue to line him up outside on most of his snaps.

In the 2012-13 season Mike Tice plans on Hester lining up on the outside, yet again.  However this year it is much different than past seasons.  The Bears have Marshall.  Teams have to respect Marshall and will most likely roll coverage his way.  If the Bears put Hester in the slot the safety can cheat and be able to split the difference between the Hester and Marshall. Since teams now have more to worry about then the speed of Hester.  This year it makes sense to have Hester on the outside because it keeps teams honest, they can’t cheat.  Cheat towards Marshall and Hester can get behind the defense with his speed.  If teams cheat towards Hester (which I can never foresee happening because he is not very good at his job that being catching the ball) Marshall will win a one on one battle with cornerbacks most of the time.  There is also Jeffery who will being playing in the slot roaming the middle of the field, even thought he is a rookie he will still demand respect at first because of his size.  But if Jeffery struggles early, which happens with most rookie wide receivers, the Bears plans go up in smoke.  But if Jeffery has some good games early the passing attack for the Bears could be very good.  The passing attack would still the third best in the NFC North.   However it could be a top 10 in the NFC.

Monday, April 30, 2012

Did Bears error on not drafting offensive lineman?


After the NFL draft this past weekend most fans, by most I mean 99.9%, wanted the Bears to draft an offensive lineman in the first few rounds.  Personally figured they would go offensive lineman in round two or three.  We all knew they were going defensive line or wide receiver with the first pick, all signs pointed out to defensive end.  I wish they would have drafted an offensive lineman at some point in the draft, would have preferred second or third round.  I am not also up in arms about them not taking an offensive lineman at all during the draft.  The Bears like who they have at the position, at least publicly.  This is what Lovie Smith had to said on Saturday, "We as a coaching staff are going to try and put the players in a better position, adding Chris and Gabe to the mix. There's a period of time, as you might have forgotten, during the season, when we played pretty good ball on the offensive line."
I have heard people say that Mike Tice loves J’Marcus Webb. Webb has shown flashes of a good player since he first started playing in the NFL, but he does not give 100% effort all the time.  Webb is not a star left tackle by any means.  Tice also likes the group as a whole.  They bears did add some depth to the position this offseason they signed G Chilo Rachal from the 49ers, who has played in all but one game since he enter the league in 2009.  In 2010 the Bears had a guard playing right tackle, a center playing right guard, a guard playing center at left tackle playing guard. Only Webb was in the spot he was penciled in as to start the season.  Also, they were down 2 starters from almost the start of the season.
The Bears also feel that the change in play calling will have an effect on the offensive line.  Which is something that I agree with, the one thing everyone knows you get with Mike Martz is your team will give up sacks.  So with Martz gone ideally there should be fewer sacks.   Also, Tice will make protection calls based on what he feels the offensive line is comfortable with and can execute.  Cutler will also have the ability to audible to the right play call and protection.
Also, with weapon(s) on the outside teams will not be able to load up the box and play man outside every passing situation.  Teams will need to either double Marshall or roll coverage to his side.  If Alshon Jeffery, Bears second round pick can produce a little bit that will also help.  With Marshall and Jeffery on the outside Devin Hester moves to the slot where he has been the most productive since he joins the Bears.  Hester is able to produce more in the slot because it is much harder to jam him when he is off the ball.  Teams also have to respect him because he is a deep threat.
Not that an of these reasons fix the talent level of the players on the offensive line, but these do take pressure of them as a unit.  I should be better in 2012 than they were in 2011.

Tuesday, March 20, 2012

Seahawks got a good deal with Flynn


One of the most intriguing free agents this year in the NFL was quarterback Matt Flynn formerly of the Green Bay Packers.  He was intriguing because there is so much that is unknown about him.  It is almost like drafting a rookie quarterback, but Flynn has played sparingly in NFL games and has started two games.  Flynn played very well in those two games, but it is hard to judge a player off just two games.  There have been many cases of quarterbacks playing sparingly and playing well to only to falter later on in their careers.  
The most recent example is Kevin Kolb, formerly of the Philadelphia Eagles, who is now a member of the Arizona Cardinals.  In July 2011, the Cardinals gave up Pro Bowl cornerback Dominique Rodgers-Cromartie and a second-round pick in 2012.  The Cardinals then turned around and gave Kolb a 5-year $63 million deal with $27 million guaranteed.  Also, just recently they had to give Kolb a $7 million roster bonus.  The Cardinals did this after seeing Kolb started only 7 games and played in a total of 19 games completing 194 passes for 2082 yards and 11 touchdowns in his four years as an Eagle.  Now Kolb has only been in Arizona for a year and could have a much better year this year than he did last year.  It is hard to judge a player off one year, in a new place and system, not sure he will be much better but only time will tell.
Flynn has actually played 34 games, most coming in 2009 when he played in 15 games.  He has started two games over his four-year career both of which have come in the last two years, one in 2010 and 2011. Flynn has completed 82 passes for 1,015 yard and 9 touchdowns. Recently, he signed a 3-year $26 million ($10 million guaranteed) with Seattle Seahawks.  By most reports of the deal it is truly a 2-year deal worth between $13.5-16 million over the course of those two years.  
This is a great deal for both the Seahawks and Flynn.  Seahawks are only committed for 2 years at a cheap price, if he turns into a franchise quarterback many people believe he can be for the Seahawks.  It is great for Flynn because he will be a starter in one of the weakest divisions in football where he can prove that he is a starter.  If he does pan out the Seahawks will most likely extend the contract in the middle of or after the 2nd year of the contract.  Seahawks also got Flynn for a million dollars less then what the Cardinals gave Kolb in guaranteed money.  It is somewhat ironic that Flynn chose the Seahawks because the last Green Bay backup quarterback, Matt Hasselbeck, to leave also went to the Seahawks.  The Seahawks and their fans are hoping Flynn turns out to be just as good as Hasselbeck was for them.
Flynn should work out for the Seahawks, but there are just as much risk here as with drafting a quarterback in the first round, simply because so much unknown.  However, instead of being tied to a first round quarterback for 4-5 years, the Seahawks are only tied for two years, but it should be much more then that as Flynn should thrive with this chance to start.  This could turn out to be the best signing of the 2012 free agency period, yes even better then Mario Williams.  Reason for that is franchise quarterbacks are harder to find than a pass rush specialist.





Sunday, March 18, 2012

Where will Peyton land?


O where O where will Peyton Manning land?  At this point no one knows. Peyton is a perfectionist; most likely turning over every stone he can find to unearth information about each team, and the members of each team.  There is talk of him wanting to stay in the AFC because he knows most of the players.  Which makes complete sense; it is easier to adjust when there is no need to have to worry about learning a ton of new defensive players.  But that is something Peyton will most likely not have a problem with, because he studies film like no other player in the NFL.  So before he picks a team he will most likely know almost everything about the players on that team.  So the question is where is he going to go?  Peyton has narrowed it down to 3 places: Denver, Tennessee, and San Francisco. Ranking the teams in order in which could be the best fit for him, obviously this is just a complete guess but I am going to base it off the roster in which each team has and the team performance from last year.

    1.)    San Francisco- I believe this will be his choice they have the best roster from top to bottom then any of the teams left.  They have had a great running game for years their biggest weakness has been their passing game.  Their defense is very solid, better than any the Colts had with him there.  This past season the 49ers lack was a passing game.  This off season they looked to improve that area; they have added Randy Moss and Mario Manningham.  Not sure how much Moss has left if he has anything left, but if Moss does this team will be even better than they were last year.  Manningham and Moss can open up the middle of the field for Vernon Davis, who was second in receiving yards behind Michael Crabtree last season.  If Crabtree can get it together, 49ers could have four good receiving options. Peyton should make them all better, with the exception of Moss.  49ers make the most sense based on the roster. Also make a ton of sense since the division is so weak, this would put them heads and shoulders above everyone else in the division. The 49ers are the only team in the NFC that Peyton is selecting from, which could be the biggest issue.  Some have said that he will stay in the AFC because that will still allow for the possibility of a Manning bowl.  


   2.)    Denver- The next best choice, they had an unbelievable season.  But the question is was it just a fluke?  Their defense had a great year but their offense struggled.  However, they were able to win games.  Tim Tebow was able to put together some good games but very streaky player to say the least.  Broncos have a good running game and defense.  However they lack any big time receivers, they have some young guys in Eric Decker and Demaryius Thomas.  Both are going to be 3rd year receivers next season, which is typically a break out year for the position. It hard to judge their production from last year because Tim Tebow was at quarterback.  They have a pretty well rounded team, adding Manning should make them the favorite in the AFC West.  This is another weak division.






   3.)    Tennessee- The sentimental choice is the Titans. Peyton went to University of Tennessee.  This would also allow him to play in the AFC south, the same division as the Colts.  Titans have two good wide receivers Kenny Britt and Nate Washington.  Have one of the best running backs in the NFL in Chris Johnson, who struggled last year after holding out most of training camp.  Had a top 10 scoring defense last season.  I think it is a good fit for Manning; not sure it is the best fit for him.






With Peyton looking for a new team it is having affects on other quarterbacks.  Alex Smith, 49ers QB last year, is now looking at his options outside San Francisco, in Miami today his next stop is Seattle. If Smith would have signed the 3 year deal he was offered the 49ers would not even be in the picture at this point, but he did not sign. This gave the 49ers a chance to take a look at Manning.  






         There has been talk of the Broncos trading Tebow if they got Manning, not sure this will happen anymore.  The most likely spot he was headed was Jacksonville but they signed Chad Henne on March 14, to a 2 year $6.75 million contract. The Broncos should hold on to Tebow and hope he can improve as an understudy of Manning’s.







The Tennessee Titans already have Matt Hasselbeck at quarterback.   He would be released if the Titans were able to get Manning.  Hasselbeck would most likely go to Cleveland since they run the same offense as Seattle did while he was the quarterback there. The Titans are another team that would have an understudy for Manning in Jake Locker.  Who has played sparingly since he was drafted eight overall in 2011.

Thursday, March 15, 2012

The Uniqueness of Baseball


The game of baseball is very unique, in the fact that almost every game a person watches or goes to something happens that could not have been expected.  There are plays in almost every game that have never been done before in the history of the game. This is an odd game because someone truly never knows what to expect at any game.  I think that’s why so many people enjoy the game so much because there is always something new happening, which is odd for something that has been around since 1864.  This play is an example of that: the score book reads 1-3-4-6 caught stealing.



The made is hard to see because you never truly see the second baseman, but the ball is only about 20 feet off the first base line.  It was a perfect throw, it really could have been any better.  When the play is slowed down the viewer can see the ball behind the runners back as he is sliding in to second.  The ball some how goes right into the glove. 

Wednesday, January 18, 2012

All NFC North Team- Defense


DE
Julius Pepper (CHI)
Jared Allen (MIN)

NT
B.J. Raji (GB)
Corey Williams (DET)

DT- or 3 tech
Ndamukong Suh (DET)
Kevin Williams (MIN)

Strong-side linebacker
Clay Matthews (GB)
Chad Greenway (Min)

Middle linebacker
Brain Urlacher (CHI)
Stephen Tulloch (DET)

Weak-side Linebacker
Lance Briggs (CHI)
Desmond Bishop (GB)

These were the hardest to select because so much outside things affect their play on the field.  The secondary’s of every NFC North team was very weak this year. The team ranked the highest in yards giving up was Detroit at 22; the lowest was Green Bay at 32.

CB
Charles Woodson (GB)
Charles Tillman (CHI)

FS
Louis Delmas (DET)
Charlie Peprah (GB)
SS
Amari Spievey (DET)
Chris Conte (CHI)

Total by team- Det- 5 Chi-5 GB-5 Min-3

Tuesday, January 17, 2012

All NFC North Offensive team


Based on stats for the most part. Hardest spots were o-line.  The end of the year team is fairly close to my preseason picks, only 6 changes
QB
Aaron Rodgers (GB)
Matt Stafford (Det)

RB
Adrian Peterson (Min)
Matt Forte (Chi)
James Starks (GB)

WR                 
Calvin Johnson (Det)
Jordy Nelson (GB)
Greg Jennings (GB)
Percy Harvin (Min)


TE
Jermichael Finley (GB)
Brandon Pettigrew (Det)
Visanthe Shiancoe (Min)

LT
Jeff Backus (Det)
Charlie Johnson (Min)

LG
Steve Hutchinson (Min)
Rob Sims (Det)

C
John Sullivan (Min)
Scott Wells (GB)

RG
Josh Sitton (GB)
Chris Spencer  (Chi)

RT
Bryan Bulaga (GB)
Gosder Cherilus (Det)


By team- GB-8 Det-6 Min-6 Chi- 2

Friday, January 13, 2012

Mr. Tebow: Love him or hate him. No middle ground allowed


Tim Tebow during pregame (1-8-12) warm-ups before the Broncos  29-23
overtime win.

I couldn’t do it anymore. I couldn’t hold back.  I have to give a Tim Tebow blog another go; I started to write a blog a few weeks ago but never finished as I ran out of steam. 
Tebow has captured the football world, even more the nation.  We now have “Tebow time” and “Tebowing”.  The TV numbers back up that he has taking the nation by storm; the Steelers Vs Broncos game on January 8, 2012 received a 25.9 rating or roughly 42.3 million people. (I don’t understand TV ratings at all, just know the bigger the number the more people that watched) Tebow gives the nation an athlete that has done nothing wrong off the field. This is great because we are finally talking about an athlete that does nothing but good things off the field instead the “bad ones” that we have become accustomed to.

Now to be honest I have never really been a fan of Tebow, because he went to Florida and I am not a big fan of Florida football.  Also, because the media has latched on to him since he was a freshman at Florida.  It’s not that I don’t like him; I just got sick of hearing about him nonstop.  It has only gotten worst since he starting playing this year and the team went on an unbelievable run. Which now has led to a win in the playoffs, which is great for them.

The biggest problem with talking about Tebow is there is no middle ground.  People who love him can’t see his play on the field, or refuse to open their eyes; only thing they see are wins.  Which at the end of the day are the only thing that matters, but it does not translate in to long term success.  

People who hate him don’t understand him and hate him for a variety of reasons.  People for some reason are not able to separate his on field play and his off field life.  Which is kind of ironic since people are able to keep players with bad reputations on field play apart for their off field problems.

We finally have an athlete by all accounts has done nothing but good things off the field and people just can’t wait to knock him.  Now part of it is the media with their nonstop coverage of Tebow.  Some don’t like his religious belief, which is their own choice.

I respect Tebow off the field for everything he does and continues to do.  For me it’s the on field play that I cannot respect, other then the wins.   Now don’t get me wrong he has gotten better most weeks he has been out there playing.  Which is great for him and the Broncos.  There are many quarterbacks in the NFL who have been able to win games despite their skills.  Reason they have talent all around them; this is something that Tebow has.  The worst two positions on the Broncos are Quarterback and receivers, receivers are young and both look like they might be good receivers in the NFL. Tebow has been getting better but he is nowhere near being a good quarterback in the NFL.  This is where people who love him start to get upset.  There is no way around it, his stats are terrible, if it was any other QB people would be calling for him to be replaced.  People look to replace quarterbacks whose teams have had good years, but they were subpar all the time.  Tebow completed just 46.5% of his passes this season for 1,729 yards.  Tebow however threw for 12 touchdowns and only 6 interceptions.  A good Td: Int ratio for any Qb in the NFl, there are good Qb with a lower ratio.

The best player to compare Tebow to is Mark Sanchez.  Now I believe Sanchez is the better QB right now, but he is not good.  To me the Jets have won in spite of Sanchez.  I feel the same way about Tebow and the Broncos.  The Broncos have won games that Tebow has done some great things in the fourth quarter.  The Broncos defense is keeping them in games allowing for “Tebow Time”.  The same thing has happened with Sanchez, who has led 11 come back wins in the fourth quarter in his 3 years in the NFL.  Tebow has been apart of 7 total in two years, one last year and one in the playoffs.  However pro-football-reference.com states that the “QB deserves no credit for the comeback”.  Which I guess since the Steelers were the ones making the comeback it makes sense but Tebow did throw the game winning TD in overtime for the Broncos.

Can Tebow be successful in the NFL? Short-term answer yes, long term answer jury is still out.  It is hard to say no to the long term because how much he has improved in such a short time period.  Would I like him to be successful? Yeah why wouldn’t I he is an underdog, everyone told him he couldn’t play in the NFL.  He is winning games but to be a long-term success he needs to improve a ton in the passing game.  He needs to learn to make reads and trust his offensive line early in games.   A lot of the plays Tebow makes are because he doesn’t see the open receivers and just takes off running.  He will grow, he could be good, but he is a work in progress that still has a ton of rough edges.  

Tebow lovers also need to pump the breaks when it comes to talking about him.  Only thing Tebow has going for him right now are the wins.  What happens once they stop coming?  I have no problem with people who like him.  I think they just need to realize this might not last long, unless he improves.  But if he does improve there will be no need for “Tebow Time” which for now I think it should be called “Elway time” since he lead 46 fourth quarter comebacks in his day.  Glad to see the magic staying in Denver, there must be something in that Rocky Mountain water.

·        FYI the most come back wins ever by a QB is 51 which is held by Dan Marino followed by Elway and Peyton Manning with 46 each.

Tuesday, November 29, 2011

BCS: More like Show Me the Money


Dear MR. NCAA,

I am sick and tired of hearing about the BCS.  You make the claim that going to a playoff system would water down the regular season. You make the claim that every game means something…I will stop right there.   Personally, I don’t see how a playoff system would water down the regular season.  I don’t see how it is okay to have a playoff system at every other level. I guess D-IA (aka FCS)-D3 mean nothing, the only level that you don’t want watered down is D-I aka FBS.  The claim that every game impacts the BCS standing is just a lie.  This coming weekend (or should I say week, since the only two days teams don’t play games are Sunday and Monday, but only when there is NFL football, otherwise any day is fair game) not ONE single game will have an impact on the BCS standing.  This year could turn into a mess, I for one don’t want to see and LSU-Bama rematch for the title. Why you ask? We’ve been there done that already. It’s was late in the season, if it was earlier in the year I would be all for it, but not now.  So I am here today to propose a playoff system that I believe could work, it might even make more money than the current system.  We all know the only thing the NCAA cares about is money. So here goes nothing.
My idea is a 16-team playoff system, starting a week after the conference championship games and ending either the first weekend in January or some time that week.  This would help the teams because a month layoff hurts timing that the team develops over the year. Oh wait, you don’t care about the game you want to hear about the money. Sorry I will get to that for you, Mr. NCAA. This system would yield a total of 15 games.  Each game could use a current bowl game for its title, since we don’t need any more bowl games.  This is the part you will like this allows you or whoever charges the company to attach their name to a bowl more money.  Which allows for a bigger TV contract since all the games are bundled together, again more money.  Also, the playoff system would allow for the game to be decided on the field, and not on a computer or a coach who ranks his own team.  This would also allow for all other bowl games to be played, but for the love of God stop with all the bowl games.  I love football but I don’t want to see two 6-6 teams battle it out.  The bowls should be a privilege not a right, and right now more than half of D-I teams make a bowl game. This is the first grade where everyone gets a ribbon for taking part.
I am open for ideas on how to come up with the 16 teams.  My idea is to use the BCS standing (I know the NCAA does not want to get rid of it) that takes the top 16 teams.  But like the current rules no more than 2 teams per conference, be willing to up it to 3.  No more AQ, unless every conference gets one.  No teams should have the right to play in the post season because they were the best in their conference at 6-6, I am looking at you UCLA, who would be the Pac-12 rep if they beat Oregon, but that’s a really big IF, but anything can happen.
So to recap
1.      16 team playoff
2.      More money
3.      Chance for more money
4.      BCS can still be used
5.      Did I say more money?

Thank You,

A concerned NCAA fan
Also a retired D3 football player (Can I get some kind of pension)

Wednesday, November 2, 2011

Is Devin Hester a Hall Of Famer?

As of right now, I say NO.  Without a doubt he is the greatest return man in the history of the game, but this does not equate to being Hall of Fame worthy. It’s hard for someone to make it as a special team player into the hall.  Take a guess at how many guys that were just special team players are in the hall... if you said one you are right.  The only player that was a special team’s player is Jan Stenerud; he was a place kicker who played 18 years. He scored 1,699 points, had a 66.8% success rate at kicking field goals and 96.5% on extra points. 

It is hard for a special teamer into make it to the hall.  For the simple fact they are on the field for so few plays a game.  Last year Marc Mariani had the most Kick Returns in the NFL with 60 over a course of a season; that is an average of 3.75 times a game. Tramon Williams lead the NFL in punt returns with 41 over a course of a season; that is an average of 2.56 times a game. 
Now these are both the top return guys from each category, not taking into account times when they did not return the ball.  However, it gives a general idea of the number of plays that they were on the field.  Taking the numbers and combining them leads to 101 plays on the field.  I’ll add the top number of fair catchers on punts, which was 21 last years.  So the total now stands at 122 plays in a season or 7.63 plays a game.

I understand that the number of kick/punt returns is not comparable to the number of plays on offense but it puts things into perspective.

Last year the team that ran the most plays during the course of the season was the Atlanta Falcons, who ran 1,097 plays on offense.  Which comes to an average of 68.56 plays a game.  Taking the team that ran the least amount of plays it comes out to 56.69 plays a game, the Titans ran the least plays a game a total 907 plays last year. 

Last year in the NFL there were a total of 32,319 offense plays ran. This is an average of 1,009.97 plays a team for the year and 63.12 play a game for each team.

Now looking at the average plays per game 63.12 and the average number of kick/punt returns a game 7.63; it takes 8.27 games for a kick/punt returner to equal the number of plays that a member of the offense is on the field for a single game.  So it takes almost a whole year for a kick/punt returner to play the equivalent number of plays that a member of the offense participates in during the course of two games.  As a result, takes a returner eight years to participate in the same number of plays as an offensive player does in one year.

Throughout Hester’s career he has returned 128 kicks and 189 punts, in 83 total games.  His combined total return is 3.8 per game, when adding his 52 fair catches it comes to 4.45 a game. Just last year Hester averaged 3.4 return-plays a game, including fair catches.  He had a total of 55 returns and fair catches.

The Bears had a total of 936 plays last year on offense. That comes out to 60.19 plays a game.  Hester only had 55 total returns last year, so he did not even play a full game based on the average number of plays the Bears had per game.

This year the Bears through seven games are averaging, 60.14 plays a game on offense. While Hester is averaging 4.42 returns a game.  He has played one half of football so far this season, as he has been involved in 31 total plays.
I understand that Hester has an impact on the game, on more than just his returns.  Some teams elect to kick the ball out of bounds on a punt instead of kicking it to him.  Also, fin the battle for field position they can flip the field advantage to their respective team.  A long return can spark a team even if it is not a touchdown.

Now Hester owns many records as a return man, he owns the career total kick/punt return for touchdown record for returns with 16.  When all is said and done he will most likely own the record for more returns for touchdowns, this includes all type of returns (punts, kicks, missed field goals, fumbles, and interceptions).

I think for Hester to make the Hall of Fame, based just on his special team accomplishments, he needs to end his career with about 25-30 returns for touchdowns.  This is going to be very hard to do, if not impossible. Another way Hester can make the Hall of Fame is if he improves himself as a wide receiver.

Now realistically Hester can improve as a wide receiver as he is still just learning to play the position. There are only a few receivers in the league that have been playing the position shorter then Hester. He is only in his fifth year playing wide receiver.  Hester will never be a number one receiver however; he can be a good slot receiver. There is no other player in the league that can run with him in the open field.  If you think there is watch his punt/kick returns, the cuts he makes and his vision are unbelievable.   

The biggest problem is that the Bears have no receivers, so Hester is made to play on the outside.  This is a problem for him because he can’t use his skill set, because he is easily jammed, due to his small stature.  It is much harder to jam a slot receiver, which would allow Hester to get off the ball clean.  His best game this year came when he played the slot the most against the Vikings, where he had five catches for 91 yards and a touchdown.

If Hester can somehow get to around 8,000 yards and 50 touchdowns as a receiver I think he has a great chance to make the Hall of Fame if he does not return another kick for a touchdown.  However, Hester would need 5,496 more yards to get to 8,000 and 37 more touchdowns to get to 50.  Can he do it? I am not sure, but I would love to see it happen.




Friday, October 14, 2011

More than just a whistle: Coaches

Coaching is one of the hardest professions in the world and one that people undervalue every day. As fans we turn on the TV or attend a game, that's about all we can do as fans. Sure we can try and coach from the stands and tell everyone around us what the coaches are doing wrong, that's the easiest part of any game. Another easy spot on the team is the armchair quarterback; sure it's easy to see where the quarterback should have went with the ball on the 2nd or 3rd replay. But it's not that easy in full speed with guys flying all around.

A good coach puts everything they have into improving their team.  However, when it comes down to the outcome of a single game itself, it's really not up to the coach whenever the team wins or loses. Sure a coach can make a few bad decisions during a game or at the end of a game, which many view as the calls that lost the game. However, that is not always the case. As Bob Conwell, one of my football coaches would say there are five plays that change a game. After hearing this for the first time I did not believe it, but it really does hold true.  Take any football game, there are five plays with-in that game that either won or lost your team the game. Sometimes the play seems like the littlest thing at the time, but it can have a major impact on the game in the end. The game comes down to the players not the coach.  The reason for this is that good players can overcome bad coaching, but good coaching can't overcome bad players.

When it comes to sports everyone wants to win, just like many other facets of life. But no one wants to win more than a coach. No one puts more work into the team or upcoming game as a coach.


Coaching can really take its toll on someone when their team isn't winning or playing well.  As a society we have been taught that winning on the field is the only thing that matters.  Society does not care what a coach does off the field, for their players or anyone else. The only thing people care about is what the team does on the field. But to be a good coach, they can not concern themselves with just the results on the field they also have to be concerned about the development  of the players on their team.  A coach plays a major role in shaping a player for the rest of their lives. Coaching is like teaching, but in a different classroom.  The subject a coach teaches depends on the sport in which they coach. However, all coaches teach players life lessons that will be instilled in the players the rest of their lives.

Wednesday, October 12, 2011

Cubs right divison, wrong team for GM


The Chicago Cubs are looking in the right division, but the wrong team for their new General Manager.  The Cubs should be looking at Tampa Bay Rays Andrew Friedman; he fits Tom Ricketts baseball philosophy.  On October 30, 2009 in Rickett’s first press conference as the new Cubs owner, Ricketts stated “We've realized there is no magic bullet, no one player you can sign," he said. "The only way you're going to do it is drafting and developing the right players and coaching them through the system and being consistent with how that talent comes up the system to give the general manager the flexibility to put the best team on the field.”  The Cubs have already begun the process of improving their minor league system, and upgrading their international scouting.  Also, they upgraded their facility in the Dominican Republic.

Theo Epstein is a good GM but I am not sure he is the right fit for the Cubs.  Epstein has had what seems like an endless bank role.  Now the Cubs are a big market team, but they are also a team looking to cut payroll over the next few years.  However, Ricketts does not seem like he wants to spend a bunch of money on free agents.  Ricketts would rather build a team from within, as he stated at his first press conference.  Which has not been Epstein strong point over the years, he has been better at finding free agents and trading for players.  Now yes, the Red Sox have had a pretty good farm system over the years, but most of their impact players have been brought in from the outside.  The biggest reason I think Epstein is a good fit for the Cubs is because he ended the Red Sox drought.

Andrew Friedman has done the most with so little.  The Rays are a small market team.  The market doesn’t even seem to care about them; they can’t even sellout playoff games.  Friedman has been the GM of the Rays since November 3, 2005.  Before Friedman was named GM the Rays never one more then 70 games. Since then the Rays have consecutively won over 70 games the last four years.  There have only been two years that the Rays did not win over 70 games and they were his first two years as GM.  The Rays have been to the playoffs three times since Friedman took over, which equates to half his time as a GM. These stats are very remarkable since the Rays play in the AL East, with the Yankees and Red Sox.  The Rays payroll this year was 41.053 million dollars.  In comparison the Yankees payroll was 202.689 million and the Red Sox payroll was 161.762 million.  The Rays could play for almost four years with their roster before they would even reach the Red Sox payroll for one year.  The Cubs are looking to cut payroll, which will still be more the Friedman has ever had to spend down in Tampa.  Epstein has never had a payroll under 120 million. Friedman has never had a payroll over 71 million.  From my understanding the Cubs are looking to have a payroll around a 100 million.  I believe that Friedman would be able to get the most out of those 100 million dollars.

The Rays minor league system has been rank in the top five for many years. This year it is ranked number three, last year it was number one.  Compared to the Red Sox which is ranked fourteenth, last year it was eleventh. Ricketts is looking to build from the inside out; this is something Friedman has been able to do down in Tampa.  Epstein has been better at building from the outside in, bringing in free agents and trading for prospects.  If Ricketts truly believes in his statement about how he thinks a team needs to build a team to win consistently. The better fit would seem to be Friedman and not Epstein.

Neither one is a bad choice, but the one that seems to fit the Ricketts baseball philosophy is Friedman. 

**This is a little late, as sources claim the Cubs have agreed to a 5 year 15-20 million dollar deal witrh Epstein**

Tuesday, October 11, 2011

NBA could lose big if Lockout ends season


The first two weeks of the NBA season were cancelled last tonight, and it is a footnote.  Reasoning it became a footnote was because there were MLB playoff games and a NFL Monday night game.  Now the cancellation had been expected since late last week, but think if the NFL cancelled it first two weeks at some point, any other game would have been interrupted. 

The NBA lockout is much different than the NFL lockout that happened this past summer.   The biggest difference is that NBA teams are actually losing money, much of the doing of team owners.  The NFL made claims that they were losing money, but it was just a ploy that the NFL owners were trying to use to get a better deal.   The NBA has a full list of problems much of which will not be quick fixes, but if they want to keep the casual fan around they must get a deal done without losing any more games.  NBA does not have everything going for them like the NFL does.  Football is the biggest sport in this country because as a country we love violence.  We also have short attention spans, games on three days a week at most is much easier to follow then having games every day of the week. 

Personally I am not a really big NBA fan but I will watch it, but I won’t watch a bad basketball game.  I also won’t go out of my way to watch the Bulls play, if I miss a game I miss a game no big deal.  However I can’t remember the last time I missed more than a quarter of a Bears game, also will watch any game that is on. Growing up in Chicago, I was able to witness six NBA championships, the first three I really don’t remember, as I was too young.  But then the Bulls went through more than a decade of bad play and knew there was no chance of them doing anything.  That is one of the biggest differences between the NFL and NBA, with the NFL there is always hope for the team one roots for at the beginning of the season too come out of not where and make the playoffs.  In the NBA thought for the most part at the being of the season people know what to expect from the their team.  NBA is all about stars and the NFL is all about teams.  In the NBA a team needs two star players or a star and a bunch of good role players.  In the NFL a team needs no stars to compete; they just need guys who play.

In Chicago there is a sense of pride now in the Bulls that has been there since the championship teams.  The Bulls are good again and are a very young team.  They also have an elite player in Derrick Rose, but I fear that the Bulls will lose everything they have built if the season is cancelled much more than a few weeks.  People will need to rediscover the team, same thing happened with hockey after they came back from their lockout after missing the entire 2004-2005 season. Same thing happened with baseball after their strike in 1994-1995.  If the NBA doesn’t want to lose fans the need to come to an agreement by the end of the week at the latest.  Even if it is just a year deal and they continue talks on a longer deal.

Owners and Players get warped up in talks that they forget the people who they really affect and that is the people that work in the stadiums.  These people are the ones who are going to miss the money they would have earn during the season.  Most players are still getting checks from their team and will continue to receive a check until the end of October.  Owners are not living off money they receive from the teams many own other teams and or business, so yes they will lose money but it will not make them have to find another job.   

I hope i get to see more highlights like these ones sooner than later 



Sunday, October 2, 2011

Like it, Love it, Steer Clear of it- Week 4


Like it
Lions (+1) vs. Cowboys

I really like the Lions this year; I see them winning this game by a Field goal.  Hard to trust Romo who could go down at any minute, because of his broken ribs and collapsed lung.  The Lions front four can get after a QB, Suh also has a history of trying to kill a QB.  The Cowboys should be able to thrown on the Lions if their offensive line can give Romo time.  However, the Lions are the better team and will show that today, but winning this game.

Love it
 Bills (-3) vs. Bengals

Bills haven’t lost to the Bengals in forever and I don’t see it happening this week.  The Bills have an elite offense, which is also a balance offensive and their defense is better then last year. The Bengals have a top 3 defense this year but they have yet to play a good offense.  The Bills should be able to impose their will on offense, and keep the Bengals in check. 

Steer Clear of it
Vikings (-3) vs. Chiefs

This game scares solely because neither team has established an identity.  The Vikings can’t play four quarters, the have lead every game they have been in this year only to collapse in the second half.  The Chiefs have lost a few guys on both sides of the ball and it’s hard to see what they are going to be.  I believe the Vikings will win the game but it’s too iffy to make that call.